In early December 2025, U.S. Senator Bernie Moreno introduced a new bill: the Exclusive Citizenship Act of 2025, officially registered as S.3283. The proposal immediately drew global attention, especially among Americans living abroad and people who hold both U.S. citizenship and another nationality.
The bill is still at a very early stage. It is not law, and dual citizenship remains legal for U.S. citizens. However, because the proposal directly concerns Americans with more than one nationality, it has created understandable concern among U.S. citizens living outside the United States.
This article explains what the Exclusive Citizenship Act of 2025 proposes, who may be affected, what the current status of S.3283 is, why the bill is considered unlikely to become law in its current form, and what it could mean for your U.S. tax obligations.
As of the latest available public information, the Exclusive Citizenship Act of 2025 has only been introduced in the Senate. It has not passed the Senate, has not passed the House of Representatives, and has not been signed into law.
|
Subject |
Details |
|---|---|
|
Bill number |
S.3283 – Exclusive Citizenship Act of 2025 |
|
Introduced |
December 1, 2025 |
|
Sponsor |
Senator Bernie Moreno, Republican of Ohio |
|
Committee |
Referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee |
|
Current status |
Introduced |
|
Cosponsors |
1 listed cosponsor |
|
House companion bill |
No related House bill listed on Congress.gov |
|
What this means now |
Dual citizenship remains legal. No action is required. |
The Exclusive Citizenship Act of 2025 proposes that U.S. citizens should owe “sole and exclusive allegiance” to the United States. In practice, this would mean that American citizens could no longer hold dual or multiple citizenship.
This would represent a significant break from current U.S. practice. Today, the United States does not generally prohibit dual citizenship. Millions of Americans worldwide hold another nationality alongside U.S. citizenship, either because they were born with it, acquired it through a parent, became naturalized in another country, or obtained it through marriage or long-term residence abroad.
The proposal contains several major provisions that would affect U.S. citizens with another nationality.
First, American citizens would not be allowed to simultaneously hold U.S. citizenship and foreign citizenship. Those who already hold another nationality would have to choose which nationality to keep.
Second, existing dual citizens would be given a limited period to choose between U.S. citizenship and their other nationality. The bill refers to a one-year period after enactment, while certain provisions would become effective later. In practice, this means that the exact timing could be complex and would depend on the final legal text and implementation rules if the bill were ever enacted.
Third, Americans who voluntarily acquire another nationality after the law takes effect would be deemed to have relinquished U.S. citizenship.
Finally, the proposal would require new administrative systems to identify and verify whether U.S. citizens also possess foreign citizenship. That would be highly complex, because the United States does not maintain a central registry of all citizens who hold another nationality.
At this stage, the likelihood that the Exclusive Citizenship Act becomes law in its current form appears low.
There are three main reasons for this.
First, the bill is still only at the introductory stage. It has been referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee and would still need to move through committee review, pass the Senate, pass the House of Representatives, and be signed by the president before it could become law.
Second, the proposal would almost certainly face serious constitutional challenges. U.S. Supreme Court precedent has long protected U.S. citizenship from involuntary loss. In Afroyim v. Rusk (1967), the Supreme Court ruled that Congress cannot strip a U.S. citizen of citizenship without voluntary relinquishment. This principle was further addressed in Vance v. Terrazas (1980), which focused on the requirement of intent.
Third, the bill would be extremely difficult to enforce. Many people do not actively “choose” dual citizenship. They may acquire it automatically through birth, parentage, marriage, or local nationality law. Some countries also make renunciation difficult or impossible. That means the bill would not only affect voluntary dual citizens, but also families, children, and people who may not even be fully aware of their nationality status.
The group potentially affected by the proposal is large and varied. It includes:
This last category is important. Nationality law is not always intuitive. A person may acquire citizenship automatically under the law of a parent’s country, even if they have never lived there or applied for a passport.
The Exclusive Citizenship Act has drawn criticism from legal experts, migration specialists, civil rights advocates, and Americans abroad. The concerns are not only political; they are also constitutional, practical, and administrative.
The proposal would likely raise serious constitutional questions. U.S. Supreme Court case law has historically placed strong limits on the government’s ability to take away U.S. citizenship without a person’s voluntary action and intent.
For that reason, any automatic loss of citizenship under S.3283 would almost certainly be subject to legal challenge if the bill were ever enacted.
There is no simple way for the U.S. government to know which U.S. citizens also hold another nationality. Dual citizenship often depends on foreign law, and foreign governments do not all define, record, or share nationality information in the same way.
Enforcement would likely take years, cost a great deal of money, and depend heavily on self-reporting. That creates a risk of inconsistency and unequal treatment.
Many children hold more than one nationality automatically. A child may be American through one parent and a citizen of another country through the other parent. Some families may also depend on dual nationality for residence rights, education, healthcare access, inheritance, or the ability to live together in the same country.
A forced choice between nationalities could create serious practical and emotional consequences.
Critics also warn that a law restricting dual citizenship could be used in ways that disproportionately affect Americans living abroad, naturalized citizens, immigrant families, and people with ties to specific countries.
For Americans overseas, the concern is not only legal. It is also personal: many Americans abroad live normal cross-border lives, with family, work, property, and obligations in more than one country.
The current proposal concerns nationality. It does not, by itself, rewrite U.S. tax law.
This distinction is important. Renouncing U.S. citizenship, losing U.S. citizenship, or being required to choose between nationalities would not automatically make past U.S. tax obligations disappear.
For U.S. tax purposes, citizenship status and tax compliance are related but separate issues. In many cases, a person who gives up U.S. citizenship must still consider whether prior U.S. tax returns were filed correctly, whether Form 8854 is required, and whether FBAR or FATCA-related reporting obligations apply for earlier years.
Possible expatriation tax consequences may also depend on the person’s individual financial and filing history. This is why it is important not to make assumptions based only on nationality status.
If you are unsure about your U.S. tax compliance, Americans Overseas can help you review your situation and clarify your options.
For now, nothing changes regarding your status as a U.S. citizen.
You do not need to give up a nationality. You do not need to file any new form because of this bill. You do not need to prepare for an immediate deadline. Dual citizenship remains legal under current U.S. law.
Americans Overseas continues to monitor developments surrounding the Exclusive Citizenship Act closely, factually, and without speculation. We will notify our community if there is any official movement in the legislative process.
Statement from Linda Mabelis:
“Daan Durlacher, co-founder of Americans & Expats Overseas, personally experienced the effects of similar laws in the past. At that time, you automatically lost your U.S. citizenship if you held a second nationality or, for example, served in the military in the Netherlands. This new Exclusive Citizenship Act follows a similar ‘America First’ line of thinking, but the impact would be enormous. Lawmakers often fail to consider the realities of Americans living outside the United States.”
At this stage, the most important thing is to remain calm. The Exclusive Citizenship Act is not law and is only at the beginning of the legislative process.
You should not renounce a nationality because of this proposal alone. You should not assume that a proposed citizenship law changes your current U.S. tax obligations. And you should be careful with speculation on social media, where legal and tax issues are often presented too simply.
What you can do now is make sure you understand your own situation. If you are a U.S. citizen living abroad, it is useful to know:
If you have questions about your personal situation, Americans Overseas can help you clarify your options.
At this stage, the most important thing is to remain calm. The Exclusive Citizenship Act is not law and is only at the beginning of the legislative process. It is advisable to follow updates exclusively through reliable sources—such as Americans Overseas or official government websites—so that you are not influenced by speculation or misinformation circulating on social media.
If you have questions about your personal situation or want clarification, you are always welcome to contact Americans Overseas. We are here to support and guide you as the situation evolves.
Contact us for more information
Find out in 2 minutes whether the IRS considers you a “US Person” and whether you may be required to file a US tax return — even if you live outside the United States.
Sources:
Answers to the most common questions about S.3283, dual citizenship, current legal status, and possible U.S. tax consequences.
The Exclusive Citizenship Act of 2025, officially S.3283, is a proposed U.S. Senate bill that would prohibit U.S. citizens from holding dual or multiple citizenship. It would require existing dual citizens to choose between U.S. citizenship and foreign citizenship.
No. The bill is not law. It has been introduced in the Senate and referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee. It has not passed the Senate, the House of Representatives, or been signed by the president.
At this stage, the likelihood appears low. The bill is still at an early legislative stage, has limited political support, would be difficult to enforce, and would likely face serious constitutional challenges.
S.3283 currently has the status “Introduced.” It was referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee after being introduced on December 1, 2025.
The bill was introduced by Senator Bernie Moreno, Republican of Ohio.
If the bill were enacted in its current form, existing dual citizens would be required to choose between U.S. citizenship and foreign citizenship. However, the bill has not passed and is not currently enforceable.
Many legal experts would likely challenge the bill on constitutional grounds. U.S. Supreme Court precedent has long held that citizenship cannot be taken away without voluntary and intentional relinquishment.
The bill itself concerns nationality, not U.S. tax law. However, if a person were to renounce or lose U.S. citizenship, tax consequences could arise. Form 8854, prior-year tax compliance, covered expatriate rules, FBAR, FATCA, and possible exit tax exposure may all need to be reviewed.
For now, no immediate action is required. Dual citizenship remains legal. The best step is to stay informed through reliable sources and make sure your U.S. tax position is clear.